Steve Dower <steve.do...@python.org> added the comment:
> I can reproduce it on latest master running on Linux. Interesting. Perhaps my actual change was to cause it to raise an error earlier (outside of a handler)? Which would mean that the Path object was always failing before, just silently. Arguably we should filter them out instead, then, rather than introducing a new supported type (as has been argued with similar changes elsewhere) in a security branch. Though I'm sure the OP would have noticed if their call was never returning any modules, so presumably it must have worked somehow. > I'm happy to open an PR, just let me know or if OP is not willing to do so > either. Feel free. I assume they'd have arrived with a PR if they were keen to write it themselves. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue44061> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
