Pierre Ossman <oss...@cendio.se> added the comment:
I've always been cautious about running patch() manually since it was easy to miss the cleanup. But those fears might be irrelevant these days when we have addCleanup(). Still, decorators are a more robust in more complex setups since you don't have to worry about setUp() being properly called in every base class. So I still think this would be interesting. A different function might be an option to avoid adding arguments. Just like there are a few special patch.*() already. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue44052> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
