Brandt Bucher <brandtbuc...@gmail.com> added the comment:
+ Nick and Guido The only benefit I see on our side is that it leaves the door open for complex assignment targets in the future, like (a, b), a[b], etc. (If I recall correctly, this is also why NamedExpr uses an expr target rather than just an identifier.) I guess I'm neutral on this. The usability argument seems weak, but I can see the separate case for forward-compatibility with possible syntax extensions in the future. Thoughts? Marking as high priority since we need to make a decision on this before the beta. ---------- nosy: +gvanrossum, ncoghlan priority: normal -> high _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue43994> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
