Petr Viktorin <encu...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Please don't lose the big picture here. Previously, the reported line number was *somewhere close* to the currently executing code. That's typically all I need from a traceback: the fix for a bug often needs to go a few lines above/below where it's reported. If, in an effort to make line numbers *exact*, we determine that there's no good line number to report and use -1 or None, we're introducing a regression. > We could give it the line number of the `with` keyword, but that might break > coverage and profiling tools. That sounds like a reasonable idea, despite the drawback. As we can see from the report, *any* change will probably break *some* tools. ---------- nosy: +petr.viktorin _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue43933> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
