Batuhan Taskaya <isidenti...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> | MatchStar(identifier? target) +1 on MatchStar(). Much more similiar to the existing node names, and also less semantically-named. > attributes (int lineno, int col_offset, int? end_lineno, int? > end_col_offset) I'm not really sure whether we should continue following this old tradition of int? end_* attributes for new sum types like pattern, considering that it was done for supporting the creation of old nodes 3.8< without any change on 3.8>=. pattern subclasses will only be created on 3.10>= so we should be safe by requiring end_* attributes. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue43892> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
