Cong Ma <m.c...@protonmail.ch> added the comment:
> I think it is *very* reasonable to expect that calling eval() on a string > should have the exact same effect as if the code that is inside the eval had > been written as part of the source code. I don't think Python's execution model is defined this way. The documentation on execution model says: > The eval() and exec() functions do not have access to the full environment > for resolving names. Names may be resolved in the local and global namespaces > of the caller. Free variables are not resolved in the nearest enclosing > namespace, but in the global namespace. > footnote: This limitation occurs because the code that is executed by these > operations is not available at the time the module is compiled. https://docs.python.org/3/reference/executionmodel.html#interaction-with-dynamic-features ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue43605> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
