Eric V. Smith <e...@trueblade.com> added the comment:
Even if we wanted to switch to "i" we'd have to continue to also support "j": there's a ton of existing code that uses it. Since "j" is used by some fields (including my own) for the imaginary part of complex numbers, and since I don't think we want to have two ways to do the same thing, I think this proposal should be objected. But if you really want to pursue it, I suggest starting a discussion on the python-ideas mailing list. ---------- nosy: +eric.smith _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue43025> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
