Ken Jin <kenjin4...@gmail.com> added the comment:
I updated the PR to take in a sequence of separators from the user - eg:
>>> urllib.parse.parse_qsl('a=1&b=2;c=3', separators=('&', ';'))
[('a', '1'), ('b', '2'), ('c', '3')]
>>> urllib.parse.parse_qsl('a=1&b=2;c=3', separators=('&',))
[('a', '1'), ('b', '2;c=3')]
I _didn't_ change the default - it will allow both '&' and ';' still. Eric
showed a link above that still uses semicolon. So I feel that it's strange to
break backwards compatibility in a patch update. Maybe we can make just '&' the
default in Python 3.10, while backporting the ability to specify separators to
older versions so it's up to users?
I'm not sure, any thoughts on this? Opinions would be greatly appreciated.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42967>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
