Steve Dower <steve.do...@python.org> added the comment:
> I think it could make sense to: > 1. Alias READ_RESTRICTED to a new READ_AUDIT flag and use the latter instead, > as it is more clear. > 2. Update the newtype docs to mention READ_AUDIT and remove documentation for > the the unused RESTRICTED flags. > 3. Deprecate the non-functional RESTRICTED flags if that's possible? > 4. Only cross the setattr/delattr audit flag bridge if a future refactor > calls for it. Sounds good to me. We can deprecate RESTRICTED with no intention to remove it, since it's documented. Do you want to prepare a PR for this? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42800> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
