Steven D'Aprano <steve+pyt...@pearwood.info> added the comment:
> Additionally, it suffers from the same issue as > sitecustomize. It is a single file that won't be a real substitute for > code execution in pth files. I thought that the consensus in b.p.o. #33944 is that code execution in pth files is an anti-feature that must be removed, not something to merely move into a new file type or location. (I may be wrong, I'll admit I haven't read the entire thread in 33944.) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42654> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
