Raghuram Devarakonda <draghu...@gmail.com> added the comment: > The attached patch is a proof of concept for throwing an exception.
If it is not too much of a problem, can you upload the patch to http://codereview.appspot.com? Reviewing there is simpler. Also, you will have to include some test cases in the patch. > As discussed on the mailing list [1], it has some shortcomings that > should be addressed before it is merged. I think that the builder interface already has correct behaviour in that duplicate sections are not allowed. So you can have 'unique_sections' control only parser interface and can set it to False by default (to be compatible with current behaviour). > [1]: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009- Correct discussion link: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-February/085838.html _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2204> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
