paul j3 <ajipa...@gmail.com> added the comment:
We could look into using a different more compact 'prog' for these error messages. Currently the subparser 'prog' uses the main prog plus positionals plus the subparser name. The goal is to construct a subparser usage that reflects required input. This is fine for the usage line, but could be too verbose for some errors. In an error, the 'prog' just helps identify which argument has problems, and doesn't need the extra usage information. Most of the time that isn't an issue, since we don't use positional much in the main parser (and when used can't have variable nargs). But I don't have immediate ideas as to what can be conveniently (and safely) changed. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue42297> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
