Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Ok, so we need to either (a) revert PR 6121 and then re-do the changes, without the changes to numbers.py, or (b) make a second PR to undo the numbers.py changes. I think there's (calendar) time available for option (b), but I'm not going to have bandwidth to do it any time soon, so there's a risk that the current changes make it into Python 3.10 purely through inertia. What's the best approach here? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue26680> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
