Kyle Stanley <aeros...@gmail.com> added the comment:

I can confirm that both on the latest version of the docs (for 3.8) and for the 
version mentioned in the issue (3.6), the issue mentioned with 
asyncio.subprocess.PIPE is no longer present. (It was likely fixed in the 
asyncio documentation overhaul that happened within the last couple of years).

As a result, I'll proceed with closing this issue. Thanks for checking, Carl.

----------
nosy: +aeros
resolution:  -> fixed
stage:  -> resolved
status: open -> closed

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue29127>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to