Yury Selivanov <yseliva...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Mark, Stefan, I don't want this to be stale so I propose to move with my suggestions: 1. We make the new API public. Mark, if you have objections to that - please elaborate with some details. IMO, the corresponding Python API is long public and there's no harm in exposing a C version of it. Especially given the fact that uvloop, cython, and even asyncio itself will be relying on that API. 2. I propose to name the new API `PyIter_Send`. Motivation: it will work with both generators and coroutines and plays nicely with `PyIter_Next`. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue41756> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
