Lewis Ball <lrjb...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Okay that makes sense. Removing things from _synchre would slow down the matching slightly, although the matching still seems plenty fast enough when done inside an if clause at the moment, so I'm not sure how noticeable the removal of `else` would be. One thing could be to search for `else:` instead of just `else` in _synchre, as only the former indicates the start of a new statement (although I guess it would actually have to check for `else[\s\\]*:` or something). Like you say though, if there are other more pressing issues with the matching then maybe it is worth fixing them all at the same time. Happy to help with that if needed. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue41388> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
