Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> added the comment: Huh, this is very weird. I can confirm that the async generator objects aren't cleaned up until loop shutdown on asyncio.
On the trio main branch, we don't yet use the `set_asyncgen_hooks` mechanism, and the async generator objects are cleaned up immediately. However, if I check out this PR that will add it: https://github.com/python-trio/trio/pull/1564 ...then we see the same bug happening with Trio: all the async generators are kept around until loop shutdown. Also, it doesn't seem to be a circular references issue – if I explicitly call `gc.collect()`, then the asyncgen destructors are still *not* called; only shutting down the loop does it. This doesn't make any sense, because asyncio/trio only keep weak references to the async generator objects, so they should still be freed. So maybe the `set_asyncgen_hooks` code introduces a reference leak on async generator objects, or something? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue41229> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com