Yury Selivanov <yseliva...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> Is it simply combining stream reader and stream writer into a single object > and changing the write() function to always wait the write (thus deprecating > drain) and that's it? Pretty much. We might also rename a few APIs here and there, like "close()" should become an "async def aclose()" We also will likely want to define a few ABCs. Which brings me to the most important point: what we need it not coding it (yet), but rather drafting the actual proposal and posting it to https://discuss.python.org/c/async-sig/20. Once a formal proposal is there we can proceed with the implementation. It's a bit of a process to follow, but we have to do it this way. ---------- nosy: +aeros, njs _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue41305> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
