Jim Jewett <jimjjew...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Looks good to me. I at first worried that the different function names were useful metadata that was getting lost -- but the names were already duplicated in several cases. *If* that is still a concern for the committer, then instead of repeating the code (as current production does), each section should just say newname=origname before registering the static method (as the patch does), and should bind a distinct name for each usage. ---------- nosy: +Jim.Jewett versions: +Python 3.10 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue41246> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
