Yury Selivanov <yseliva...@gmail.com> added the comment:

> Changes in bpo-41242 were rejected not because the new code is worse, but 
> because it is not obviously and significantly better that the existing code. 
> Here status quo wins for the same reasons. This rule saves us from endless 
> rewriting the code and allows to focus on important things.

+1.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41244>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to