Michael Felt <aixto...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment:
I have been doing manual tests - and it seems build is broken for AIX and xlc. I shall be working on a git bisect to try and identify what broke it for xlc-v11. Finding what broke xlc-v13 will require more time. Note: it is no longer limited to _decimal not being built - builds (i.e., compile) fail completely atm. regards, Michael On 15/06/2020 18:55, Michael Felt wrote: > Michael Felt <aixto...@felt.demon.nl> added the comment: > > I'll switch my bot https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/119 to use > c99_r rather than xlc_r. > > Test 1129 will b e the first with c99_r (and xlc v13). > > On 11/06/2020 00:37, Stefan Krah wrote: >> Stefan Krah <ste...@bytereef.org> added the comment: >> >> So it would still be interesting to see what happens if you compile >> libmpdec with c99_r (emphasis mine): >> >> >> """ >> This command supports all ISO >> C99 language features, but does >> not support IBM language >> extensions. Use this invocation for >> *strict* conformance to the C99 >> standard. >> """ >> >> ---------- >> >> _______________________________________ >> Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> >> <https://bugs.python.org/issue40878> >> _______________________________________ >> > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue40878> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue40878> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
