Steven D'Aprano <steve+pyt...@pearwood.info> added the comment:
3.5 and 3.6 are now only accepting security fixes. Only the stability of random.random is guaranteed across versions, but you are calling randrange: https://docs.python.org/3/library/random.html#notes-on-reproducibility So I am pretty sure that this will not be considered a bug (unless it is a design bug). Personally I think that the lack of reproducibility of the full range of random methods is a rather large annoyance: if you care about reproducibility, including doctests, you cannot use anything in the module except random.random, but have to write your own implementation (possibly by copying and pasting). I don't have a good solution for this though. ---------- nosy: +steven.daprano versions: -Python 3.5, Python 3.6 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue40682> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
