STINNER Victor <vstin...@python.org> added the comment:
I created this issue to propose PR 19631 (BaseRandom class) which looked like as a good idea to me: simple base class which fix different kind of problems. But it seems like other people would prefer a complete rewrite from scratch and require a PEP. I abandonned my BaseRandom PR #19631 and my PR 19700 since there is no clear consensus on these changes. I'm not interested to write a PEP to redesign the module random. I also close this issue as rejected. If someone wants to enhance the random module, it seems like a PEP is needed: at least, please open a separated issue. I wrote PR #19797 "Remove C implementation of Random.randbytes()" to address initial Raymond's concern on randbytes() implementation: https://bugs.python.org/issue40286#msg366860 ---------- resolution: -> rejected stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue40346> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
