Dennis Sweeney <sweeney.dennis...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Thanks for reaching out! This is about test failures, not problems with
installation process, correct? I took a look at the failures:
======================================================================
ERROR: test_add_file_after_2107 (test.test_zipfile.StoredTestsWithSourceFile)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/gpfs/scratch/sjfleck/modulefiles/Python-3.8.2/Lib/test/test_zipfile.py", line
606, in test_add_file_after_2107
os.utime(TESTFN, (ts, ts))
OSError: [Errno 75] Value too large for defined data type
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It looks like the test excepts an OverflowError but not an OSError, so I think
it should do both.
======================================================================
ERROR: test_setrusage_refcount (test.test_resource.ResourceTest)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/gpfs/scratch/sjfleck/modulefiles/Python-3.8.2/Lib/test/test_resource.py",
line 131, in test_setrusage_refcount
resource.setrlimit(resource.RLIMIT_CPU, BadSequence())
ValueError: not allowed to raise maximum limit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think this is a bug in the test: a non-root process increasing its hard
resource maximum should raise. So I think this maybe BadSequence()[i] should
return limits[i].
======================================================================
FAIL: test_touch_common (test.test_pathlib.PosixPathTest)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/gpfs/scratch/sjfleck/modulefiles/Python-3.8.2/Lib/test/test_pathlib.py", line
1761, in test_touch_common
self.assertGreaterEqual(st.st_mtime_ns, old_mtime_ns)
AssertionError: 1587754085552569712 not greater than or equal to
1587754085553625000
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Similar to: https://bugs.python.org/issue19715
======================================================================
FAIL: test_sendall_interrupted (test.test_socket.GeneralModuleTests)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/gpfs/scratch/sjfleck/modulefiles/Python-3.8.2/Lib/test/test_socket.py", line
1527, in test_sendall_interrupted
self.check_sendall_interrupted(False)
File
"/gpfs/scratch/sjfleck/modulefiles/Python-3.8.2/Lib/test/test_socket.py", line
1514, in check_sendall_interrupted
c.sendall(b"x" * support.SOCK_MAX_SIZE)
AssertionError: ZeroDivisionError not raised
======================================================================
FAIL: test_sendall_interrupted_with_timeout
(test.test_socket.GeneralModuleTests)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/gpfs/scratch/sjfleck/modulefiles/Python-3.8.2/Lib/test/test_socket.py", line
1530, in test_sendall_interrupted_with_timeout
self.check_sendall_interrupted(True)
File
"/gpfs/scratch/sjfleck/modulefiles/Python-3.8.2/Lib/test/test_socket.py", line
1514, in check_sendall_interrupted
c.sendall(b"x" * support.SOCK_MAX_SIZE)
AssertionError: ZeroDivisionError not raised
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Looks related to https://bugs.python.org/issue18643 .
Perhaps SOCK_MAX_SIZE needs to be increased for this test, or be made
system-dependent?
======================================================================
ERROR: test_ignore (test.test_multiprocessing_forkserver.TestIgnoreEINTR)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/gpfs/scratch/sjfleck/modulefiles/Python-3.8.2/Lib/test/_test_multiprocessing.py",
line 4874, in test_ignore
os.kill(p.pid, signal.SIGUSR1)
ProcessLookupError: [Errno 3] No such process
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Looks similar to: https://bugs.python.org/issue33532
----------
nosy: +Dennis Sweeney
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue40380>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
