Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> added the comment:
-1 I am opposed to this redesign. There is no problem being solved that warrants changing a long standing public API. It is irresponsible to just guess at whether anyone is using the API. To add randbytes() could have just been a simple two line addition. None of what is being proposed is necessary -- there are no known user problems being solved. At best, this is unnecessary code churn. At worse, it will be a breaking change. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue40346> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
