Hrvoje Nikšić <hnik...@gmail.com> added the comment: Thanks for the clarification, I didn't know about the change to non-daemon threads.
I still think this patch is useful, and won't harm general use because it is opt-in, just like daemon threads themselves. I suggest to update the PR to specify non-waiting pool at the point of creation rather than in shutdown(). (That will also make it more acceptable for the same option not being supported for process pools - it is ok for constructor signatures to differ.) If there is interest, someone should take over the PR, as I have changed jobs and no longer have time to actively pursue this issue. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36780> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
