Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: Hello,
> I've backported condbranches-plus.patch to trunk, and I'm getting these > results: Thanks! > PyBench: 1.84-2.21% faster > 2to3: 3.83% faster > Spitfire: 6.13-6.23% faster What is Spitfire? > I've haven't tested condbranches.patch vs condbranches-plus.patch; what > difference are you seeing, Antoine? condbranches.patch is the earlier version (without POP_OR_JUMP and JUMP_OR_POP), it can be ignored. > This patch mostly looks good, though you still need to change Doc/ > library/dis.rst and the pure-Python compiler package. Well, the pure-Python compiler package doesn't exist in py3k, for which I've initially made the patch. (and its state in 2.x is very sorry...) _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4715> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
