Kyle Stanley <aeros...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> This change introduced a leak in test_asyncio: bpo-40115. Thanks for bringing attention to it Victor. It seems like a rather odd side effect, considering that PR-19149 had no C code and was internal to concurrent.futures and threading. I did not expect asyncio to be dependent on the executors using atexit and daemon threads. I'll see if I can figure it out, but this one might be a bit tricky to troubleshoot. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue39812> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
