Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Thanks for the suggestion, but I will decline. The existing wording communicates the intended mental relationship between the product() and nested for-loop. IMO, the proposed change obfuscates that main point. The details of how product works are communicated in the pure python equivalent block that follows. That code clearly shows that each pool is first converted to a tuple. So, your point about infinite iterators is already covered and doesn't need to be said twice. We could replace "the same as" with "roughly the same as", but I don't really think that would be an improvement. ---------- resolution: -> rejected stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue39755> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
