Raymond Hettinger <rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
Attached an updated patch which expands the tests and docs. Handles the r>n case with an empty result. Leaves the r<0 case as a ValueError. Am thinking that if we do this, it should be treated as a bug and posted to 2.6 and 3.0. Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12640/combperm.diff _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4816> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
