Sever Băneșiu <banesiu.se...@gmail.com> added the comment: > Anyway :) Practically, the test does work on both py3k and another > implementation, so I don't see any urgency to remove anything from it. Indeed, it doesn't hurt keeping it.
For completeness' sake I've updated your tests to cover the pre-flush condition existent in the python implementation. Theoretically this should be the desired behavior in any other implementation. Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file12636/nonblocking2.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4263> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com