Richard Bruskiewich <richard.bruskiew...@delphinai.com> added the comment:
This "bug" is buzzing around my project head right now, interfering with the operation of the Python Fire CLI library when it attempts to interrogate the Python Pandas DataFrame using the inspect.getmembers() call. See https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/31474 and https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/pull/31549. I have code that uses Fire and Pandas, but have to "dumb it down" to use Pandas 0.24.3 rather than the latest 0.25.1 which raises a "NotImplementedError" which leaks out of the getmembers() call. The Pandas people are passing the buck to you folks in the Python community. This is terribly frustrating for we minions in the real work trying to implementing real working software systems leveraging all these wonderful libraries (and the Python language). When is this "bug" going to be fixed? Help! ---------- nosy: +richardbruskiewich _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue35108> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
