Raymond Hettinger <rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
David, at this point, I recommend dropping this one. It has become a time waster. Possibly, there is a refactoring of the code that makes parsing a bit simpler or shares some common code but it is not worth destabilizing the battle-tested code and risking the introduction of subtle new parsing errors. ---------- priority: normal -> low versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1 -Python 2.6, Python 3.0 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2121> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
