Sebastian Berg <sebast...@sipsolutions.net> added the comment:
Thanks for the quick responses. @Victor Stinner, I suppose you could change `numbers.Complex.__bool__()` by adding the no-op bool to make it: `bool(self != 0)`. But I am not sure I feel it is necessary. NumPy is a bit a strange in that it uses its own boolean scalar, and it is easy to override the slot for such objects. ---------- nosy: +seberg _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue39274> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
