Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> added the comment:
-1 I think the module is better-off without this function. There are already more functions than most people know or remember. For most cases, re.search() or re.finditer() will suffice. Also, I don't recall having seen findall(...)[0]. If it does exist, it is likely an education problem (i.e. something that can be addressed with documentation or a faq). ---------- nosy: +rhettinger _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue39165> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
