Batuhan <batuhanosmantask...@gmail.com> added the comment:

I am not sure that if co_filename can break backwards compability or not 
(because until CodeType.replace; it was usual to break code object 
construction, people who are using code objects may take this too) but yes PR 
17534 was necessary. 

My initial patch (PR 13527) proposed a future directive to do this (and poorly 
implemented the concept) which can be helpful (yet it needs a PEP).

----------
nosy: +BTaskaya

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue20443>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to