Gregory P. Smith <g...@krypto.org> added the comment:
Strictly speaking not all of those _need_ to be touched given the old name is always going to exist for backwards compatibility. But I agree that we should update them as part of this regardless. I'd go forward with a PR. The only fallout I expect a change like this to have on users is in the very odd test scenario where someone has hardcoded the error name in a string. That is rare, especially for an re.error which is generally not an expected exception. ---------- nosy: +gregory.p.smith _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue38981> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
