STINNER Victor <vstin...@python.org> added the comment:
OMG parsing an URL is a can of worms... There are so many open issues related
to URL parsing!
* bpo-18191: urllib.parse.splitport("::1")
* bpo-20271: urllib.parse.urlparse('http://[::1]spam:80')
* bpo-28841: urlparse.urlparse() parses invalid URI without generating an error
(examples provided)
* bpo-33342: urlsplit("//user:[@host")
* bpo-34360: 'http://[::1]]'
* bpo-35377: urlparse doesn't validate the scheme
* bpo-35748: 'http://www.google.com\@xxx.com'
* bpo-36338 (this issue): urlparse('http://demo.com[attacker.com]')
* bpo-37678: urlparse('http://user:pass#?[w...@example.com:80/path')
Related:
* bpo-3647: urlparse - relative url parsing and joins to be RFC3986 compliance
* bpo-16909: urlparse: add userinfo attribute
* bpo-18140: issue with 'http://auser:secr#et@192.168.0.1:8080/a/b/c.html'
* bpo-22234: urllib.parse.urlparse accepts any falsy value as an url
* bpo-22852: "urllib.parse wrongly strips empty #fragment, ?query, //netloc"
* bpo-23328: issue with "http://someuser:a/b@10.11.12.13:1234";
* bpo-23448: "urllib2 needs to remove scope from IPv6 address when creating
Host header"
* bpo-23505: [CVE-2015-2104] Urlparse insufficient validation leads to open
redirect
There are 124 open issues with "urllib" in their title and 12 open issues with
"urlparse" in their title.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36338>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
