Evgeny Nizhibitsky <nizhibit...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Oh, I see that in the initial code with leakage (it was heavy ThreadPoolExecutor + xgboost thing) there was an await but I must have lost it somewhere while reducing it to the minimal example and finished in the wrong direction. Glad too see that it raised a discussion to prevent others from getting into this silent trap. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue38430> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
