STINNER Victor <vstin...@python.org> added the comment:
> We should not provide such an "run arbitrary python code before execing the > ultimate child" feature in the standard library. Do you want to modify _posixsubprocess to call umask() between fork() and exec()? As it has been done for uid, gid and groups: call setreuid(), setregid() and setgroups()? If so, it means that posix_spawn() couldn't be used when the new umask parameter would be used, right? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue38417> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
