jackotonye <tonye...@gmail.com> added the comment:

Might be best to make it a little more obvious since most examples are
considered executable code. That would require little modification.

On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 12:20 PM SilentGhost <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> SilentGhost <ghost....@runbox.com> added the comment:
>
> imaginary in the example is not meant to refer to
> https://pypi.org/project/Imaginary/ it's meant to refer to a module that
> you could write that would do all the dirty work. Perhaps, it's not the
> best name to use provided there is an actual module on pypi, alternatively
> half-baked outdated modules could be remove.
>
> ----------
> nosy: +SilentGhost
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
> <https://bugs.python.org/issue38349>
> _______________________________________
>

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38349>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to