Phillip J. Eby <p...@telecommunity.com> added the comment: Graham: thanks for pointing that out; I completely forgot we already *had* the migration discussion on the Web-SIG! It just slipped my mind because I didn't have any 3.0 work on the horizon.
Dmitry: A question about the new patch. Are bytearray and memoryview objects in 3.0 really the same as bytestrings? It seems to me that allowing mutable bytes objects is a mistake from a bug-finding standpoint, even if it could be a win from a performance standpoint. I think it might be better to be more restrictive to start out, and then let people lobby for supporting other types, rather than the other way around, where we'll never get to narrow the list. Apart from that, the patch looks pretty good. Thank you! _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4718> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
