STINNER Victor <vstin...@python.org> added the comment:
Sadly, GH-15710 was merged without mentioning the bpo-37812 (this issue) in the
final commit message :-(
commit 6b519985d23bd0f0bd072b5d5d5f2c60a81a19f2
Author: animalize <animal...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri Sep 6 14:00:56 2019 +0800
replace inline function `is_small_int` with a macro version (GH-15710)
This second change introduced a regression: bpo-38205 "Python no longer
compiles without small integer singletons".
I don't understand the whole issue. A first change converted a macro to a
static inline function. The second change converted the static inline fnuction
to a macro... but the overall change introduced a regression. Why not reverting
the first change instead of pushing a new change?
Morever, if using a static inline function is causing issues, it would be nice
to add a comment to explain why, so the issue will be avoided in the future.
----------
nosy: +vstinner
resolution: fixed ->
status: closed -> open
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37812>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
