Dmitry Vasiliev <d...@hlabs.spb.ru> added the comment: Antoine Pitrou wrote: > FYI, instead of trying to do exhaustive type checking in _check_type(), > you can just rely on duck typing and catch the TypeError:
Good point! I'll update the patch soon. _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4718> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
