Steve Dower <steve.do...@python.org> added the comment:
Yes, even as a struct member name (at least in the definition), the C preprocessor will substitute a macro. It sounds like Qt defines a macro "slots", and so the definition of the struct will be broken. Unfortunately, this would be a more significant change than removing the deprecated tp_print field, which we eventually decided not to do because of the compatibility impact. So I can confidently say we won't be able to do this one either. ---------- nosy: +steve.dower resolution: -> rejected stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue38007> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
