Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: Hello again,
> Still, I think this patch does too much code duplication. There should > be only a single function that does the optional untracking; this then > gets called from multiple places. The point was to avoid slowing down the critical path of tuple creation in the most common cases. If it is considered too hackish, then I agree the other patch (tuple+dictopts-alt.patch) should be considered instead. By the way, perhaps pybench should grow a GC test (e.g. derived from Greg's script). What do you think? _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4688> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
