Raymond Hettinger <rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
Will think about it for a bit. My initial inclination is against because there have been no other such requests to instrument all the fundamental data types, because it's not hard to add instrumentation using your own pure python additions around size-mutating calls, because it clutters the API, and because it's unclear whether a maximum-size statistic has much utility. For deques, should the clear() method zero-out the high-water mark? How about the equivalent code where the contents are all popped-off (down to zero size) before the structure is re-used? ---------- assignee: -> rhettinger title: Queue class should include high-water mark -> deque class should include high-water mark _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4680> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
