Vinay Sharma <vinay0410sha...@gmail.com> added the comment:

Hi Andrew,
Thanks for replying!

I understand that the behavior change is not backward compatible. But the 
current behavior is a bit ambiguous ad mentioned by Dimitri, therefore I have 
updated the documentation and opened a Pull request.

I would be very glad if you could review it.
Thanks!

Also, would adding an optional argument like force_cancel=False to 
``gather.cancel``, which won't return even if gather is done be backward 
compatible. Should I open a PR with this change also, so that you can better 
review it and see if it looks good.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37703>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to