Marco Paolini <markopaol...@gmail.com> added the comment:

I also confirm Inada's patch further improves performance!

All my previous benchmarks were done with gcc and PGO optimizations performed 
only with test_json task... maybe this explains the weird results?

I tested the performance of new master 69f37bcb28d7cd78255828029f895958b5baf6ff 
with *all* PGO task reverting my original patch:

iff --git a/Modules/_json.c b/Modules/_json.c
index 112903ea57..9b63167276 100644
--- a/Modules/_json.c
+++ b/Modules/_json.c
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ scanstring_unicode(PyObject *pystr, Py_ssize_t end, int 
strict, Py_ssize_t *next
                 if (d == '"' || d == '\\') {
                     break;
                 }
-                if (d <= 0x1f && strict) {
+                if (strict && d <= 0x1f) {
                     raise_errmsg("Invalid control character at", pystr, next);
                     goto bail;
                 }

... and surprise...

Mean +- std dev: [69f37bcb28d7cd78255828029f895958b5baf6ff] 5.29 us +- 0.07 us 
-> [69f37bcb28d7cd78255828029f895958b5baf6ff-patched] 5.11 us +- 0.03 us: 1.04x 
faster (-4%)

should we revert my original patch entirely now? Or am I missing something?

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37587>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to