New submission from Jason Curtis <thatn...@gmail.com>:
I've just been trying to implement some logic which potentially involves reversing things back to their initial orders, and it'd be nice to just be able to call reversed() on something that has already been reversed. >>> reversed(reversed([1,2,3,4])) TypeError: 'list_reverseiterator' object is not reversible Seems like this should be trivial to implement by just returning the initial iterator. Happy to post a pull request if it would be considered. ---------- components: Library (Lib) messages: 349085 nosy: jason.curtis priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: reversed class should implement __reversed__ type: enhancement versions: Python 3.7 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue37770> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
